{"id":297577,"date":"2026-07-24T12:01:40","date_gmt":"2026-07-24T12:01:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/casinocoins.net\/housebets-wave2\/"},"modified":"2026-07-24T12:01:40","modified_gmt":"2026-07-24T12:01:40","slug":"housebets-wave2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/casinocoins.net\/es\/housebets-wave2\/","title":{"rendered":"Housebets On-Chain Bonus Wave 2: The Wallet Scan, Deconstructed"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

18+<\/strong> | Affiliate disclosure: this review contains affiliate links; we may be compensated for sign-ups. Opinions are our own. Gamble responsibly: BeGambleAware.org<\/a><\/p>\n

Context first: our Housebets casino review<\/a> covers the rakeback model behind all of this.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Last updated:<\/strong> July 2026<\/p>\n

Wave 1 of the Housebets On-Chain Bonus closed on July 23, 2026<\/strong>; the official @housebets account announced the sequel the same day: August, “major improvements”, no exact date. Plenty of pages will hype that. This one explains the machinery: what the scan actually reads, why certain addresses fail it, and what you disclose by claiming.<\/p>\n

Look around Housebets ahead of the August window →<\/a><\/p>\n

18+ | Play responsibly<\/p>\n

The Pipeline in Five Steps<\/h2>\n
    \n
  1. Submit up to five wallet addresses<\/strong> you have used to deposit at other crypto casinos (Stake, Shuffle and BC.Game are the sort of venues that qualify).<\/li>\n
  2. Housebets scans each address’s public on-chain history<\/strong>.<\/li>\n
  3. You are quoted a bonus scaled to your historical deposit volume<\/strong> \u2014 more past turnover, larger quote.<\/li>\n
  4. You send 1 USDT from each submitted wallet<\/strong> to prove you control it.<\/li>\n
  5. The bonus lands with 1x wagering<\/strong>; once cleared, it is withdrawable.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    “Scan” Means Read, Not Connect<\/h2>\n

    No WalletConnect session, no signature request, no token approvals, no spending permissions. The system reads chain data that was already public, and the 1 USDT transfer serves as ownership proof. Your keys never touch Housebets \u2014 the boundary here is informational, not custodial, and that distinction is worth understanding before you dismiss or trust the mechanic.<\/p>\n

    Why Bybit and CryptoBot Addresses Bounce<\/h2>\n

    Exchange deposit addresses and custodial services \u2014 Bybit and CryptoBot are the named examples \u2014 fail the scan<\/strong>; only non-custodial wallets such as Trust Wallet qualify. Structurally that makes sense: a custodial address belongs to the platform’s wallet infrastructure, not to you, so a transfer sent “from” it proves nothing about one person, and its mixed history cannot be attributed to a single player. If your entire gambling history ran through custodial rails, Wave 2 has nothing to measure \u2014 that is the hard eligibility line.<\/p>\n

    The Privacy Trade, Stated Plainly<\/h2>\n

    Here is the part promo posts skip: claiming links up to five addresses to each other and to your Housebets account. The chain data was public before; the attribution<\/em> is new, and you are the one creating it. If you deliberately compartmentalise wallets, decide whether the bonus is worth collapsing that separation. One operational note from Wave 1: community members reported TRC-20 wallets scanning with errors<\/strong> \u2014 possibly fixed for Wave 2, not confirmed.<\/p>\n

    What Wave 1 Reportedly Paid<\/h2>\n

    Community reports \u2014 history, not promises \u2014 put Wave 1 grants between roughly $30\u201345 and $15,000<\/strong>, scaled to volume. Early claimants reportedly saw larger quotes, with amounts declining through the day, and an extra $1,000 was given for a post on X<\/strong>. Withdrawals after clearing were widely reported as taking minutes. Whether Wave 2 repeats any of this is unknown; “major improvements” is the entire official description.<\/p>\n

    Clearing 1x, Properly<\/h2>\n

    A 1x rollover sounds trivial, but Wave 1 players reported that low-risk instant-game bets \u2014 Limbo at tiny multipliers, say \u2014 counted only ~25% toward wagering [needs verification]. If that logic survives into Wave 2, clear the requirement on fully counting games instead of grinding micro-risk bets that mostly do not register.<\/p>\n

    Preparation Checklist for August<\/h2>\n